Canadian Human Rights Act, Section 13. (1) It is a discriminatory practice for a person or a group of persons acting in concert to communicate telephonically or to cause to be so communicated, repeatedly, in whole or in part by means of the facilities of a telecommunication undertaking within the legislative authority of Parliament, any matter that is likely to expose a person or persons to hatred or contempt by reason of the fact that that person or those persons are identifiable on the basis of a prohibited ground of discrimination. R.S., 1985, c. H-6, s. 13; 2001, c. 41, s. 88.
Notice that the Canadian government's own online posting of this statute is self-violating.
Update: Here is an interesting NYT article about the relevant case in Canada, and how the US differs from much of the western world with regard to hate speech protection. So do *we* have it wrong?
This is your forum to exchange ideas and questions about course material, philosophy talks at TTU, & any other philosophy stuff that you want to discuss beyond the classroom. From here you can also link to the TTU Philosophy Department as well as to my web site to find your course syllabus, advice on writing philosophy papers, and many other useful philosophy links (see below). The rules:1. To post a new topic: If you are not a contributor, email me with your topic and I will either post it for you or add you as a contributor. 2. To post a comment: Just click on the topic title or on 'comments' and the option to add a comment will show up at the bottom of the screen. 3. Don't be shy: anonymous postings will be deleted. Have fun!